Nipple Piercings, Male and Female

(Editor’s note: These articles were first published in The Point, the publication of the Association of Professional Piercers. Since part of BME’s mandate is to create as comprehensive and well rounded an archive of body modification as possible, we feel these are important additions.

Paul King, the article’s author, has given BME permission to publish a series of articles he wrote for The Point that explore the anthropological history behind many modern piercings. This is another in that series. This time, however, we are combining two of his articles — male and female nipple piercings — into one general nipple piercing–related column. Enjoy.)

MALE NIPPLE PIERCING

Dear Readers,

It may seem odd at first glance that I have chosen to separate the history of nipple piercing, a shared anatomical piercing, into two topics. The reason is twofold. Until modern times, males and females within a culture have not shared this custom, and because of the volume on this topic, the articles work best broken up.

First of all, Roman Centurions did not have their nipples pierced. Over the years it has been my great pleasure (and fortune) to have had many long discussions with Jim Ward, Founder of Gauntlet, PFIQ and longtime friend of Richard Simonton (a.k.a Doug Malloy). Jim has told me the genesis behind this urban myth. It appears that Doug’s only evidence of the Romans having pierced nipples was a photograph of a baroque statue from Versailles. In the photo the statue is wearing a breastplate with rings for attaching a cape. When Jim conveyed his doubts about Doug’s rather stretched conclusions, Doug replied, “Well it makes a good story…”

It appears the Karankawa Native Americans, a now extinct nomadic people that previously inhabited the Gulf Coast of Texas, “pierced the nipples of each breast and the lower lip with small pieces of cane.” That they could heal these piercings is particularly interesting since they “smeared their bodies with a mixture of dirt and alligator or shark grease” to thwart mosquitoes.1

Both American and British sailors have passed on legends of getting pierced as an initiation for having passed an important latitude or longitude, (i.e. Tropics of Cancer and Capricorn or the International Date Line, etc.). There is enough folklore and photos to substantiate the old tales of “sailors with pierced nipples adding links each time the sailor crossed the equator.”2 However, the adding of links seems to be a lesser known practice. Additionally, there exists an abundance of sailor stories for earlobe piercing. Since the turn of the century, sailors such as Le Captain Ringman or The Great Omi, heavily tattooed and pierced, would sometimes reenter mainland society as sideshow human oddities.

The 1950s and ’60s were a time for self-exploration and sowed the seeds of the modern day body modification and S/M communities. Men such as Fakir Musafar (Rowland Loomis) and Jim Ward compelled to pierce their own nipples, bravely figured out their procedures in an information vacuum.3

Let’s count our blessings, times have changed!
__________________
1 The Handbook of Texas Online, by Carol A. Lipscomb at www.tsha.utekas.edu, her bibliography: Albert Gatschet, The Karankawa Indians, the Coast People of Texas, (1891), William Newcomb, The Indians of Texas, (1961), Richard Schaedel, The Karankawa of the Texas Gulf Coast, (1949).

2 PFIQ (Piercing Fans International Quarterly # 21)

3 Fakir pierced his nipples in 1956, Jim Ward in 1968

* * *

FEMALE NIPPLE PIERCINGS

The previous issue discussed the history of the male nipple piercing. As most of you know, I enjoy setting the record straight, debunking myths and documenting the facts. I thought this month I’d do the same thing. Instead, once again, I’ve gotten another of life’s lessons on expectations. Things are not always as simple as they would seem. What I’ve done this month is uncovered a quagmire of dead-end trails, shedding some new light on the history of female nipple piercing, with much still remaining in the dark.

Perhaps the oldest attribution of female nipple piercing comes from Eduard Fuchs. He was a German scholar, “sexologist” and writer from the early 1900s. To the best of my knowledge his work has never been translated. Unfortunately my understanding of the German language isn’t even rusty, it’s nonexistent. So I have to rely on quotes from his works that appear in various books and documents. It has been mentioned on the rec.arts.bodyart newsgroup that Fuch as well as an author named Pelham,1 “made extensive use of the same English source, one article in Society, a journal unavailable to me.”2 I, too, have been unable to find any record of this journal from the turn of the century. Perhaps some inquisitive and persistent English readers could help with further research through their local libraries.

Quoting Fuch’s writing as the source, Hans Peter Duerr’s book, Dreamtime,3 traces the earliest known practice of female nipple piercing to perhaps the Court of Queen Isabella of Bavaria. Her rule (1385 to 1417), though extravagant was rather short lived:

“Queen Isabella … introduced the ‘garments of the grand neckline,’ where the dress was open to the navel.4 This fashion eventually led to the application of rouge5 to freely display nipples, those ‘little apples of paradise’ to placing diamond-studded rings or small caps on them, even piercing them and passing gold chains through them decorated with diamonds, possibly to demonstrate the youthful resilience of the bosom.”6

I have included the entire section of text here with footnotes not normally quoted from Dreamtime in order to illustrate that though piercing of female nipples may have occurred during the Court of Queen Isabella, we cannot draw that conclusion from this passage as written. The paragraph was patched together by Mr. Duerr using three sources, some written over 60 years apart and in different languages. Until more research is done, one can only deduce that the fashion of the time led to a trend of piercing nipples at some unspecified later time, perhaps months or even years later. Some may say I’m splitting hairs here, but I would hate to see the female nipple piercing renamed the “Queen Isabella,” follow me?

Eduard Fuch is again quoted by author Stephen Kern, in Anatomy and Destiny. This time the reference is much later and from a different source. “In the late 1890s the ‘bosom ring’ came into fashion briefly and sold in expensive Parisian jewelry shops. These ‘anneaux de sein’ were inserted through the nipple, and some women wore one on either side linked with a delicate chain. The rings enlarged the breasts and kept them in a state of constant excitation.7 This provocative ornamentation was rare …”

Unfortunately things get even murkier from here. D.W. Jones, who seems to have done a fair amount of research, posts on rec.arts.bodyart, “In 1898 a single Bond Street jeweler is supposed to have performed the nipple-boring operation on forty English ladies and young girls … In fact many ladies, instead of rings, had small chains fastened from breast to breast, and a celebrated actress of the Gaiety Theatre wore a pearl chain with a bow at the end.”8 Unfortunately, this is not footnoted and as such will have to be treated as an urban myth until the source is traced. If anyone knows how to track down D.W. Jones, please tell him I’m looking for him …

The twentieth century brought a flurry of sensational books on erotica. Unfortunately most authors’ intent was more to titillate than to educate. It’s hard to find facts not steeped in the authors’ opinions, usually running to extreme. The necessity for footnotes or bibliographies was usually overlooked in these quasi-scientific books. A strong support for D.W. Jones’s post may be found in this following passage from a book of this lurid genre:

“No more perfect example of Victorian extremism can be found than the unbelievable breast piercing craze that swept London in the 1890s. This barbaric practice achieved fantastic popularity among seemingly sane, civilized Englishwomen, who submitted to the excruciating pain of having their nipples, pierced in order to insert decorative gold and jeweled rings. In an attempt to explain what had driven so many females to embrace such a crackpot fad, a fashionable London modeste wrote a letter to a popular magazine,9 which said in part, ‘For a long time I could not understand why I should consent to such a painful operation without sufficient reason. I soon, however, came to the conclusion that many ladies are ready to bare the passing passion for the sake of love. I found the breast that the ladies who wore rings were incomparably rounder and fuller developed than those who did not. My doubts were now at an end … So I had my nipples pierced, and when the wounds healed, I had rings inserted … With regard to the experience of wearing these rings, I can only say that they are not in the least uncomfortable or painful. On the contrary, the slight rubbing and slipping of the rings causes in me a titillating feeling, and all my colleagues to whom I have spoken on this subject have confirmed my opinion.’”10

Fuch’s French joined with Jones’s and Hurwood’s English references of the same period seem to support the notion of a brief but extraordinary fashion trend. It would be wonderful to someday discover in which country the trend started and by whom.

A piece of folklore I feel compelled to share was passed on to me by Jim Ward. However, please understand none of my research, in anyway substantiates this information appearing in World Medicine. “In the France of Louis XIV [1638-1715], the church condoned the extreme décolleté of ladies’ fashions only because the wearing of gold rings through the exposed nipples made them ‘dressed,’ not bare. The fashion spread across the Channel and a few haut ton [hauteur?] had gold rings inserted in their nipples. But as far as I can find out, the regular wearing of nipple rings has been common only among the Berber tribe of northern Algeria known in the mountains as the Kabyle.”11

Researching the Kabyle, I could find no anthropological references to female nipple piercing. It is near impossible to believe the women of the Kabyle-Berber society, would have nipple piercings when one considers:

a) Religiously, they’re fairly strict Muslim.
b) Culturally, they’re extremely subjugated and sexually repressed by Kabyle men, and,
c) Materially, they’re almost exclusively limited to silver and coral for jewelry adornment. Trying to heal a nipple piercing with silver seems rather hindering, if even possible.

It’s surprising that such a sensational article could appear in a medical journal without any annotation. But to quote Doug Malloy, “It makes for an interesting story anyways, doesn’t it?” If any reader has documentation to support any statements from the medical journal article, please come forth. I have been unable to track the article’s author.

After the 1890s, the female nipple piercing seems to go completely underground. I have been unable to trace any references or photos until the quite remarkable piercing legend, Ethel Granger. For those readers unfamiliar with Ms. Granger, she appeared in the first edition of Guinness Book of World Records. She was entered as the Smallest Waist in the world.12 With strong encouragement from her husband, Ethel started modifying her body when she got married in the 1920s. By World War II, she had both her nipples pierced and over ten ear piercings in each ear many of them stretched and or punched, including her conch. She had two piercings in her nostrils and one in her septum that she could connect by running a knitting needle from one nostril, through the septum and out the other nostril.13 Certainly there were more women secretly with adorned nipples, however material remains elusive.

In closing, having read both nipple articles, the reader will notice from the 1890s onward both men and women of European and American societies were having their nipples pierced. However it appears very early on, female nipple piercing was preformed within the fashion conscious affluent classes while male nipple piercing was practiced by the working class fringe, mostly sailors and carnies. While the stylish quickly dropped the practice, those finding significance in the ritual or ornamentation in their lifestyle, carried on the tradition. In the later half of the twentieth century, it appears not much has changed.

______________
1 I am not familiar with the author Pelham or his work.

2 A website hosted by Anne Greenblaat, http://www.faqs.org/faqs/bodyart/piercing-faq/historical/, Article: “Titrings, a bit of History” by D.W. Jones, posting date May 2000

3 Dreamtime, Concerning the Boundary between Wilderness and Civilization, by Hans Peter Duerr, 1978, translated by Felicitas Goodman, 1985.

4 Dreamtime, pg 54, original text footnote #62, author K. Weinhold, Die deutschen Frauen in dem Mittelalter II, (Wein, 1882), pg. 276

5 Dreamtime, pg 54, original text footnote #63, author M. Garland, “The Changing Face of Beauty,” (London 1957), pg. 71

6 Dreamtime, pg. 55, original text footnote #64, author Eduard Fuchs, Die Frau in der Karikatur, (Muchen, 1925), pg. 179.

7 Anatomy & Destiny, Stephen Kern, (New York 1975), pg. 97, original text footnote # 8, author Eduard Fuchs, Illustrierte Sittengeschichte vom Mittelalter bis zur Gegenwart, Erganzungsband, (Munich 1912) pg. 68. Fuchs refers to an original article in Geschlecht und Gesellschaft, Bd. II, Heft. 3.

8 From the website hosted by Anne Greenblaat, http://www.faqs.org/faqs/bodyart/piercing-faq/historical/, Article: “Titrings, a bit of History” by D.W. Jones, posting date May 2000

9 Unfortunately no magazine title is given! Could this also be the illusive “Society” magazine?

10 The Golden Age of Erotica, Hurwood. 1965. pg. 305-306.

11 Those Little Perforations. Tim Healey, Radiologist. Article in World Medicine November 15, 1978.

12 Guinness has since changed the category to Smallest Waist on a Living Person. So unfortunately, Ethel has been displaced by a living, though larger, waist!

13 Piercing Fans International Quarterly (PFIQ), Issue #15, Interview by Fakir Musafar, Editor Jim Ward.

My usual disclaimer: I am not an anthropologist. From time to time, there will be errors. Please be understanding and forth coming if you have any information you would like to share.

* * *

Please consider buying a membership to BME so we can continue bringing you articles like this one.



This entry was posted in APP by Paul King. Bookmark the permalink.

About Paul King

Paul King is a Professional Body Piercer (since 1991) and an enthusiast before that! He is Gauntlet trained and certified with a one and half year apprenticeship under Elayne Angel. He worked in all three former Gauntlet locations, Los Angeles, New York and San Francisco and was store manager of LA and NYC. In 1996 Jim Ward, Founder of Gauntlet, awarded Paul King with the honorary title of Master Piercer. He apprenticed many Piercers for Gauntlet as well as co-taught Gauntlet Training seminars. Paul King has lectured at Universities, (including San Francisco State, SF Academy of Art and Skyline College), and the Association of Professional Piercers, (APP), on various aspects of body piercing. He is an avid traveler, collector and layman anthropologist. In 1999 Paul King and Grant Dempsey partnered to create Cold Steel America, two tattooing and piercing shops in San Francisco. He is an active member of the Association of Professional Piercers. He successfully completed a three year elected board member position for the APP. In 2007 he received the APP’s President’s Award for contributions to the Piercing Industry. He currently serves the APP again as the appointed Treasurer. Please visit his website at http://store.ebay.com/Rituals-of-Life to view photos of travels, tribal piercing and tattooing artifacts. He can also be found at www.myspace.com/paulrking He loves to guest lecture, so just ask!

27 thoughts on “Nipple Piercings, Male and Female

  1. Pingback: BME: Tattoo, Piercing and Body Modification News » ModBlog » New Article Posted!

  2. Very interesting article as always!

    I’m not sure if this is a stupid question, but is it actually true that the breasts of women:
    “who wore rings were incomparably rounder and fuller developed than those who did not.”

    I’ve never really heard anything about the physical effect of nipple piercings before…

  3. My god that woman in the last picture seriously has some of the most amazing breasts I’ve ever seen.

  4. I really don’t mean to be rude, and I understand that I’ve read more than my share of information and probably shouldn’t expect to learn anything new….but since the start I’ve felt that these articles end before they really get started. They just kind of go on about the general background/debunking Doug Malloy’s pamphlet and then stop (on that note, every single one of them has gone of on the tangent to debunk the pamphlet sometimes without even mentioning it and assuming the reader has read the pamphlet or has heard the stories it contained). I’d like to hear more about the piercings than everything up to the point where they started becoming “popular” eventually ending with their state today.

  5. I have limited background information about most modern piercings, so I do enjoy reading articles such as these. I am not looking for an in-depth article on the ultra-specific, I have my school work for that. I find it fun to read the articles and glean a little knowledge that I would have not otherwise come across.

  6. My nipples have gotten longer and thicker since they were initially pierced. Perhaps that’s what they were referencing?

  7. i agree with comment #5. they are absolutely perfect and gorgeous. makes me feel even more insecure though because i can tell theyre natural, which just means that i missed out genetically.

  8. I’m a male and I recently got my nipples pierced with barbells, however I’ve noticed mine are pierced different than most other piercings I’ve seen. Instead of my barbell going through the tip of the nipple it actually goes through the region under the teat. Does anyone know why the piercer would choose to pierce it this way as opposed to the more traditional way? I’ve also heard the piercing is painless when I found it to be one of the most painful things that has ever happened to me.

  9. dear bunson:

    In my experience the male nipple is extremely sensitive, in fact it usually ‘hurts’ more for guys then gals. i would never suggest doing a nipple piercing that extends into the areola, never ever in woman because of the chance of mastitus (a infection of the milk ducts). But in guys since there is no chance of mastitus (right? 95% sure) and since usually a male nipple is quite flat with little actually nipple (hah) most guys that don’t have the anatomy for a nipple piercing get one any way and the piercer just goes slightly lower more in the areola then the nipple. i guess depending how far into the areola it is, it wont be a problem a long as its not to much, o hope you dont have to much problem is healing it. :)

  10. @Katy Prost,

    Funny you should say that, I just tore it in my sleep the other night. I just talked with the piercer over the phone and he thinks it was a tear and suggests I come in and get it checked out. So I’m off to the shop soon enough.

    Thanks for the response.

  11. Many years ago I corresponded with Ethel Grainger’s husband Will. Unfortunately I no longer have those letters but as I remember them it is not accurate to say that “With strong encouragement from her husband, Ethel started modifying her body ….” Her husband was the driving, piercing force and Ethel was not all all keen on either corseting or multi-piercing at the start of her marriage. I am sure that she became a willing if not totally enthusiastic participant later.

    I had a couple of letters from her after the death of her husband.

    I have a copy of the booklet he wrote “An exclusive production … biography of Ethel G., the world’s smallest waist” An amplified version of this appears on a German web site. The book stops at the end of WWII. He said that he was going to produce a sequel but I do not believe he ever did so.

  12. I just got my nipples pierced today, so this was a pleasant article to find. My discovery of it may be severely belated, but I enjoyed it just the same.

  13. Hey there,

    just in case you’re still interested in finding out more about Fuchs’ works and their translation, maybe I could help?
    I’m German and would be glad to help you out with translating certain passages?!

    Anyway, I really enjoyed reading this :)

  14. I think the last pair of breasts look disturbing. The orange-peel texture of the skin is a symptom of inflammatory breast cancer. She should get checked.

  15. I can’t speak to the other references, but I truly doubt the story about Isabelle of Bavaria. She acted as regent for her husband, the mad French king Charles VI, negotiated the hated Treaty of Troyes, and was blamed by French nationalists for the worst losses of the Hundred Years War. Like many other female rulers (e.g. Catherine the Great), the easiest way for her opponents to denigrate her was through rumors of sexual promiscuity. In fact, this might actually be a reference to the Marquis de Sade’s novel about Queen Isabelle, which of course reflects more the Marquis’s fevered imagination than it does Isabelle’s own life.

  16. why are all the photos of breasts in this article huge, supple and symmetrical (even one of the males featured is fairly flawless)? i feel like this is a skewed depiction of nipple piercings. also, it would be interesting to research when plastic surgeons began piercing nipples to build scar tissue in the hopes of pushing out inverted nipples.

  17. I’ve had both nipples done. However, the piercings are not of equal depth. I want to go into the areola, so as to lengthen the nipple.The piercings are vertical. I plan the to put another horizontal. So far, my nipples are a bit longer and fuller. Enjoyed the information.

  18. Comment on last photo. With black and white photography, contrast is enhanced. A plus when one is trying to make a statment. [in an artistic sense I guess. beautifull women photograph beautifully.]

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>