56 thoughts on “Zippy, The Pinleg.

  1. It looks like she’s pulling her butt cheeks apart in a distasteful display of pussy. Yet another modblog slut. Could’ve worn some boyshort panties or something and the picture would’ve still been great. This is extremely unnecessary as the object of modification are her legs, not her vagina.

  2. I too, thought it was a tattoo (too many ‘t’s in that sentence!) and thought it was awesome! It’s still awesome, is it sewed on or are they needles? Cos they don’t look like needles, but I’m just confused.
    Oh I make no sense.

  3. #6 Quite everyone here likes gratuitous nudity shots.
    Don’t watch bme or quit bitching.

  4. I like body modification. If the modification regards the genitals, then it makes sense to show them. I just think it’s not necessary to be pulling apart your butt cheeks to show something with no modifications on a body modification site. Thanks for being the spokesperson for EVERYONE on bme, K. Art is subjective and I’m not against nude art.

  5. Paraphrasing Stephen Fry – we can’t dispense with everything because it’s unnecessary, nor should we want to. The best things in life are unnecessary.

  6. #16 ~ I had the same reaction upon seeing the photo. It is indeeed awesomely beautiful, and the gratuity just sort of spoils that.

  7. It doesn’t look like she’s pulling anything apart to me. She just looks like thats her natural body shape, which happens to be sexy as hell.

  8. #6 I think that the main focus of the image is the zippers, and having something other than flesh would detract from the focus of the image given they way the shot has been framed.

  9. i don’t think there is any pulling involved, though the bits are framed nicely. :-)

    the zippers, i thought were awesome tats before i looked closer.

  10. S:

    Boyshort panties wouldn’t really be going far enough. People might still enjoy her unmodified ankles, or the natural curvature of her buttocks. Really, everyone who wants to model on this site should begin with a body-obliterating burqa-like black sheet. Then they can cut out holes that expose just the areas of their body that are modified (in this case narrow slots that follow the backs of her legs), and have a picture taken of that. Only then can we finally be sure that no one is enjoying looking at or showing off body parts that don’t strictly pertain to the subject of this site.

    (Also, anyone who says there’s something to be said for the way a modification works aesthetically in relation to the rest of the unmodified body is wrong.)

  11. Hey #6 “If you just want to prove that you can say the meanest thing about something you don’t understand, go somewhere else. This is a community of friends, and the IAM/BME TOS applies here.” If the mods had a problem with it, they wouldn’t have posted the picture.

  12. I just read your second comment, S, It’s a lot more thought out, and I believe I misinterpreted the first one. I owe you an apology, S, I jumped to conclusion and judged you too fast.

  13. S – If you don’t like it don’t view it. It’s just labia which I think are quite beautiful.

    Also I don’t think that she is pulling her butt cheeks apart because there is no indentation in the flesh to indicate she is applying force. Just a hand position.

  14. That is the coolest thing I’ve seen in a long time. I didn’t even notice the cheeky pull apart, too busy looking at the zips.

  15. Even if she is pulling her butt cheeks apart, could it not be argued that it is in theme with the zippers, which would then be totally relevant to the mod and the photo?

  16. S: She’s not doing anything to make her vagina more visible, contrary to what you believe.

  17. #33 Actually there is a slight pull that is visible by one crease and the position of her hands do suggest that she is pulling it apart.

    #31 I actually think the picture would’ve looked better maybe without it being pulled apart but that makes sense! I do see how the picture could be unified now. I’ve just been seeing lots of seemingly purpose less exposure on the internet lately, and I couldn’t see how that part of the image fit in with the modification.

    Bunson – That’s ok. Everyone gets misinterpreted somewhere down the line :)

  18. Actually, I didn’t even notice the gratuitous nudity until I read the comments; I was too busy admiring the fabulous mods!!!

  19. Can I just say that I honestly didn’t even notice her pussy was showing in the picture until it was pointed out? I’m really not that dense, I was just drawn to the actual modification going on. It’s a lovely picture of an awesome body modification. Why do we have to make a big deal out of everything?

  20. S … Shes not pulling apart her butt cheeks to show her genitals she just has her arms down on her legs and butt. Not only that I don’t think I would go around calling people sluts just because of one picture. You have no idea if she is actually a whore. Anyone who has mods has a special relationship with their body and their mods and every part is part of that beauty. You say you are not against nude art. How is this not nude art?

  21. Or maybe she just wanted to show some skin with like minded people over the Internet but didn’t want to be identified from the pictures? (rather self conscious perhaps?)
    Also I must say that the bottom half of her seems quite attractive.

  22. I didnt notice her pussy showing either till I read the comments.

    Definitely not the main focus of this shot…

  23. haha im with you 40 didnt even notice till they started talking about it. i guess that tells you something some people are here for the love of the mods, and some people are here to pick apart and complain about everything

  24. Actually, I didn’t even notice the gratuitous mods until I read the comments; I was too busy admiring the fabulous nudity!!!

  25. The way I see it, she’s clearly not pulling her butt cheeks apart, and it’s pretty lame to me personally to argue such a point on modblog. It’s all about the mods baby, but let’s not start limiting our creating artful ways of shooting those mods.. That’s all..

    And that is a beautiful picture, and an excellent idea! :)

  26. Herger,

    I didn’t notice either until I read the comments ….And I’m glad I did. That’s some nice poon! Only complaint is that it’s not visible enough :)

  27. Jesus why is everyone complaining about the vagina shot.
    Where you all born middle-aged?
    Get over it!
    It’s a gorgeous picture and a brilliant piece of work.

  28. I’m kinda jealous. I’ve always wanted zippers. o:
    Even the stitching is pretty.

  29. stunning work, thank you kev & ms anonymous!

    chalk me up as another who didn’t notice the nudity until he read the comments… heaven help anybody who thinks this picture is about pussy.

  30. OK EVERY ONE, FIRST OFF, THANK YOU EVERY ONE WHO HAS COMPLIMENTED MY WORK. IT REALLY MEANS THE WORLD TO ME.
    SECOND, SHE (who will remain nameless) IS NOT, I REPEAT NOT SPREADING HER BUTT CHEEKS APART. THAT IS THE WAY HERE BEAUTIFUL BUTT IS.
    THIRD, THEY ARE REAL ZIPPERS AND REAL THREAD ACTUALLY SEWN IN TO HER SKIN. IT TOOK ABOUT 3 HOURS TO DO WITH I THINK 52 NEEDLES. I DID IT WITH THE ZIPPERS OPEN SO WE COULD REALLY ZIP IT UP!!! SHE SAID THAT THAT PART WAS REALLY NICE. HA
    FOURTHLY, SHE IS NAKED BECAUSE THE PHOTOGRAPHER (MY GF) WANTED TO SHOW THAT SOMETHING AS BEAUTIFUL AS “OUR FRIEND” (A WOMANS BODY) COULD BE IN HARMONY AND BEAUTY WITH SOMETHING THAT ISN’T USUALLY CONSIDERED HARMONIOUS AND BEAUTIFUL.
    AND LAST BUT NOT LEAST: IF YOU LOOK REALLY CLOSE, TO THE CONTROVERSIAL NUDITY, SHE IS REALLY LIKING IT IF YOU KNOW WHAT I MEAN. HAHA

    IAM: STUCKBYKEV

  31. Pingback: ModBlog - Mum’s The Word! - Body modification and ritual blog sponsored by BMEzine.com

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>