Take one for the team.

If there’s one practice associated with the body modification community that enrages and disgusts the general publicand truthfully, many within the community itself it’s voluntary amputation.

To be wary of it is one thing: Amputation certainly carries with it not only a sense of permanence far surpassing many other modifications, but also generally causes a major upheaval in the way one will live his or her life from that point on, with most people on the sidelines assuming the life of the amputee will be far more difficult and unhappyno matter how many stories there are to the contrary [MORE, MORE, MORE].

While many find it comfortable to write off those with these desires as lunatics who just havent found the right cocktail of medication to correct whatever mental illness is plaguing them, the psychological conditions that may cause such desiressuch as Body Integrity Identity Disorder and Apotemnophiliaare absolutely real and based solidly in fact. These conditions even made it to prime time last year when a story of voluntary amputation became the premise of a very special episode of CSI: New York.

As with most things though, peoples opinions tend to shift dramatically when the reasoning behind the act becomes something that is more favorable to the public at large.

Be it for love:

For God:

Or in this case, for the love of the game:

Brent Blackwell, an Australian rugby player who had broken his finger three years ago and has felt considerable pain ever since, was given two options: Fuse the bones together and give up his sporting livelihood to allow for proper healing, or lop the bastard off and continue playing.

Normally the sort of situation where a coach may ask a player to just sit this one out, Blackwell went the amputation route, losing the ring finger on his left hand, and resumed his professional career no worse for wear.

Admitting that it was a bit drastic, he added: I love my footy and love playing sport and if that’s going to help me to succeed at this level then it’s something you’ve just got to do.

This scenario is not unheard of though: In the final game of the 1985 season for the NFLs San Francisco 49ers, safety Ronnie Lott got his pinky finger stuck in the facemask of an opposing player. Forced to sit out the rest of the game, he was given the similar options of reconstructive surgery and a term on the disabled list or amputation of the top segment of his finger, chose the latter option, and was back with his team in time for the playoffs.

For these two athletes, amputation was nothing short of a heroic move. I guess its not gross if its good game.

(Blackwell and Lott links via BoingBoing.)

This entry was posted in ModBlog and tagged , , , , by Shannon Larratt. Bookmark the permalink.

About Shannon Larratt

Shannon Larratt is the founder of BME (1994) and its former editor and publisher. After a four year hiatus between 2008 and 2012, Shannon is back adding his commentary to ModBlog. It should be noted that any comments in these entries are the opinion of Shannon Larratt and may or may not be shared by BMEzine.com LLC or the other staff or members of BME. Entry text Copyright © Shannon Larratt. Reproduced under license by BMEzine.com LLC. Pictures may be copyright to their respective owners. You can also find Shannon at Zentastic or on Facebook.

One thought on “Take one for the team.

  1. If people want to lop off bits of their body, why should the wider community interfere? That being said, mostly as a disclaimer, I think it’s fucking stupid. The top picture – of the couple – that’d be nice and romantic if the girl lost a finger in an accident and her boyfriend got his removed, but otherwise is no more appealing to the community than any other voluntary amputation.

    Comparing the sacrifice of various sportsmen to body modification doesn’t work, because they’re just that – sacrifices. People who cut shit off to feel better about themselves or change their appearance aren’t doing so in pursuit of some greater goal. Different if a diagnosed disorder causing the desire to be without some bit of your body (retarded though that sounds), but otherwise your logic is fucked.

    Oh and I can’t be bothered commenting two different bits, as this is just a page I stumbled upon through Google, but you contradicted yourself on two other articles. One has pictures of a tattoo which is a copy of another design, and you attack the copier claiming it’s an insult to the original artist (the custom design being something very personal), yet you suggest tā moko shouldn’t be just for māori and islanders. That’s fucked. Moko is unique to each family, and copying the general patterns or the whole design from someone is akin to claiming to be a part of their family. For a webmaster asking people to go somewhere else before commenting on “something you don’t understand” you seem quick to gift moko to the world. Just so you know, I think people should be free to get whatever ink they want – be it moko, or a custom design from another artist. Once you put the ink on your body and show it off, other people should be free to mimic what they perceive as a good tattoo.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>